LIVE
Thousands protest as Trump, other world leaders set to meet for G7 summitDid a medieval flying monk spot Halley's comet, twice? It's complicatedFBI disrupts massive AI-powered phishing service using a million URLsPokémon Card Sales Are Surging on Crypto Platforms—Just Don't Call It GamblingAmerica at 250 is riven with doubt and pessimism — but with glimmers of hopeScientists found a surprising problem with sugar-free dietsShanaka, Mishara fifties set up series-levelling win for Sri LankaKnicks NBA Championship Merch Includes Official Locker Room T-Shirt, Signed Jalen Brunson BasketballsQatar earns first ever World Cup point'Awards Chatter' Pod: Seth MacFarlane on His 'Ted' TV Series, When to Expect a 'Family Guy' Movie and Why "The Emmys Are So F***ed Up"Clarke: Haiti was a must-win game - and we wonAs Anthropic suspends access to new models, India debates its AI futureWhy middle age is becoming a breaking point in the U.S.U.S. Soccer Men's National Team Victory Scores Record English-Language World Cup Ratings; Mexico vs. South Africa Biggest in Spanish-Language HistoryWant to Be a Basketball League Owner? Ice Cube’s Big3 Is Going PublicThousands protest as Trump, other world leaders set to meet for G7 summitDid a medieval flying monk spot Halley's comet, twice? It's complicatedFBI disrupts massive AI-powered phishing service using a million URLsPokémon Card Sales Are Surging on Crypto Platforms—Just Don't Call It GamblingAmerica at 250 is riven with doubt and pessimism — but with glimmers of hopeScientists found a surprising problem with sugar-free dietsShanaka, Mishara fifties set up series-levelling win for Sri LankaKnicks NBA Championship Merch Includes Official Locker Room T-Shirt, Signed Jalen Brunson BasketballsQatar earns first ever World Cup point'Awards Chatter' Pod: Seth MacFarlane on His 'Ted' TV Series, When to Expect a 'Family Guy' Movie and Why "The Emmys Are So F***ed Up"Clarke: Haiti was a must-win game - and we wonAs Anthropic suspends access to new models, India debates its AI futureWhy middle age is becoming a breaking point in the U.S.U.S. Soccer Men's National Team Victory Scores Record English-Language World Cup Ratings; Mexico vs. South Africa Biggest in Spanish-Language HistoryWant to Be a Basketball League Owner? Ice Cube’s Big3 Is Going Public
🚨 Breaking News

Starmer to announce ‘Australia plus’ ban on social media for under-16s

Photo by Jonny Gios on Unsplash

Prime Minister Keir Starmer is preparing to announce sweeping legislation that will prohibit children under 16 from accessing major social media platforms including TikTok, Instagram and X, marking a dramatic hardening of the government's stance on youth online safety. The move, described internally as "Australia plus" in reference to similar legislation passed by the Australian government, represents a significant policy escalation beyond measures previously signalled to the public. The announcement signals the most restrictive approach to youth social media access yet adopted by a major Western democracy. Beyond the outright bans on mainstream platforms, the government plans to impose additional controls on digital products not covered by the prohibition, including gaming applications, which would be required to remove or disable the ability for young users to communicate with strangers. This multi-layered regulatory framework reflects growing governmental concern about the psychological and developmental effects of social media exposure on adolescents, combined with persistent anxieties about online predatory behaviour and exploitation.

The scope of Starmer's announcement extends considerably further than previous government briefings had suggested, indicating a substantive shift in policy direction. The restriction targets the largest and most influential social media platforms currently dominating youth engagement, encompassing applications with billions of global users. Gaming applications and online environments not explicitly classified as social media platforms will face mandatory modifications requiring companies to either eliminate direct messaging functions between unknown users or implement robust age verification and consent mechanisms. The legislation signals that responsibility for enforcement will fall primarily on technology companies themselves, with expectations that platforms implement effective age-verification systems to prevent underage access. The government's description of the measures as "Australia plus" acknowledges that while the Australian framework banned under-16s from social platforms through legislation passed in late 2024, the British approach adds supplementary restrictions targeting adjacent digital products and communication channels. This expansion suggests Starmer's administration views the Australian model as an important reference point but believes additional safeguards are necessary to address the full spectrum of youth online interaction risks.

The timing of this announcement reflects escalating public and political pressure surrounding youth mental health and digital safety, following years of debate about platform regulation. Concerns about social media's impact on adolescent psychology have intensified significantly, with research increasingly linking excessive screen time and platform engagement to rising rates of anxiety, depression and self-harm among teenagers. Previous government consultations and reviews, including parliamentary inquiries into online safety, have repeatedly highlighted the absence of meaningful age restrictions on major platforms despite terms of service technically prohibiting access for users below minimum age thresholds. The Online Safety Bill, which entered law in 2023, established a regulatory framework through Ofcom but stopped short of implementing direct usage bans. Starmer's announcement represents recognition that voluntary compliance and soft regulatory measures have failed to adequately protect young users. The political environment has shifted substantially, with child safety advocates, parent groups and mental health professionals amplifying calls for more decisive government action. Australia's recent passage of its social media age restriction legislation, which generated significant international attention, appears to have crystallized political will within the British government to pursue comparably strict measures.

The implications of this policy extend far beyond Britain's borders, potentially establishing a new global standard for government intervention in platform regulation and youth access. The announcement places Starmer's administration at the forefront of a worldwide movement toward age-based restrictions on digital platforms, positioning Britain alongside Australia as a pioneer in this regulatory approach. Technology companies face the prospect of fragmenting their business models to comply with jurisdiction-specific age restrictions, creating operational and enforcement challenges at scale. The policy also reflects broader anxieties about digital corporate power and the capacity of unregulated platforms to shape adolescent development without meaningful parental or governmental oversight. Implementation will require sophisticated age-verification technologies, raising separate concerns about data privacy and the collection of identity information from young users. The precedent established by Britain and Australia may encourage other democracies to pursue similarly restrictive approaches, potentially triggering an international realignment of how social platforms operate and how governments regulate youth digital access. For British technology companies and digital entrepreneurs, the announcement signals a regulatory environment becoming increasingly hostile to unfettered youth platform engagement.

Starmer's formal announcement will outline specific implementation mechanisms and timelines for the legislative framework, with technology companies expected to face binding requirements for compliance. The Online Safety Bill's regulatory authority, Ofcom, will likely assume a central role in enforcement and monitoring, establishing technical standards for age verification while ensuring companies demonstrate measurable progress toward the access restrictions. Technology firms will face deadlines for implementing these changes, with potential financial penalties for non-compliance establishing concrete incentives for rapid adaptation. The government is expected to clarify whether existing users below the age threshold will face immediate removal from platforms or whether restrictions will apply prospectively to new registrations. International negotiations with major technology companies, particularly American-headquartered platforms, will prove crucial to determining whether these restrictions proceed globally or apply only within British jurisdiction. Parliament's response and potential amendments to legislation will occur through the normal legislative process, providing opportunities for refinement and pushback from industry advocates or civil liberties groups concerned about privacy implications. The Office of Communications and various parliamentary committees will oversee initial implementation phases, reporting publicly on compliance rates and effectiveness in reducing youth platform access within defined timelines.